On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:31 PM, dag.odenhall@gmail.com
The practice seems to be to not export it, but maybe it would be a better practice to export it. That way it can work without DefaultSignatures too, and if you use the generic-deriving package it could work with zero extensions or GHC-specific dependencies.
Are you adding support to hashable after all? I'd love that, but thought you decided against it because of the clash with the existing defaults.
We did a major redesign of the library (without affecting users much). This meant that hash became a top-level function and hashWithSalt the only method of the Hashable class. As it's now the only method we don't have a default implementation for it anymore (except the default method signature). -- Johan