Hello, I've run into an odd problem when building certain packages that use Template Haskell with GHC-7.4.1. For example, RepLib: $ cabal --version cabal-install version 0.13.3 using version 1.14.0 of the Cabal library $ cabal install -O2 -w ~/.ghc-7.4.1/bin/ghc RepLib --reinstall Resolving dependencies... Configuring RepLib-0.5.2... Building RepLib-0.5.2... Preprocessing library RepLib-0.5.2... [ 1 of 12] Compiling Generics.RepLib.R ( Generics/RepLib/R.hs, dist/build/Generics/RepLib/R.o ) [ 2 of 12] Compiling Generics.RepLib.R1 ( Generics/RepLib/R1.hs, dist/build/Generics/RepLib/R1.o ) [ 3 of 12] Compiling Generics.RepLib.Derive ( Generics/RepLib/Derive.hs, dist/build/Generics/RepLib/Derive.o ) [ 4 of 12] Compiling Generics.RepLib.PreludeReps ( Generics/RepLib/PreludeReps.hs, dist/build/Generics/RepLib/PreludeReps.o ) Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done. Loading package integer-gmp ... linking ... done. Loading package base ... linking ... done. Loading package type-equality-0.1.0.2 ... linking ... done. Loading package array-0.4.0.0 ... linking ... done. Loading package deepseq-1.3.0.0 ... linking ... done. Loading package containers-0.4.2.1 ... linking ... done. Loading package pretty-1.1.1.0 ... linking ... done. Loading package template-haskell ... linking ... done. Loading package transformers-0.2.2.0 ... linking ... done. Loading package mtl-2.0.1.0 ... linking ... done. cabal: Error: some packages failed to install: RepLib-0.5.2 failed during the building phase. The exception was: ExitFailure 11 This is without library profiling enabled. If I enable library profiling, the unprofiled build is fine but the profiled build exits with the same error, at the same location. If I pass the "-v" argument to cabal-install, the package builds fine with profiling disabled. The "-v" flag makes no difference with profiling enabled, although some packages (but not RepLib) work with "-v2" I haven't seen this with ghc-7.2.*, but I'm guessing this is some sort of cabal-install bug. Has anyone else witnessed anything like this? Thanks, John L.