Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework

I'll add that as an issue on github then. I tried implementing this for test-framework and failed - the code was just too complicatd for me. It'll be intereseting to see whether tasty has simpler implementation :) Janek ----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- Od: "Roman Cheplyaka" Do: "Jan Stolarek" DW: haskell-cafe@haskell.org Wysłane: środa, 7 sierpień 2013 10:56:21 Temat: Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework It certainly can, but it doesn't do that yet. Should be very easy to fix, though. Patches are welcome. Roman * Jan Stolarek [2013-08-07 10:00:36+0200]

Sorry, my last email got sent too quickly. Anyway, continuing my thought. So QuickCheck can classify tests:

+++ OK, passed 100 tests (29% Short)

Can tasty display this classification info? That was a thing I missed a lot in test-framework and would probably motivate me to switch to tasty.

Janek

----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- Od: "Roman Cheplyaka" Do: haskell-cafe@haskell.org Wysłane: wtorek, 6 sierpień 2013 22:51:57 Temat: Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework

* John Wiegley [2013-08-06 13:40:50-0500]

...

...

...

...

...

> Roman Cheplyaka writes:

...

I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing framework for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to test-framework (which is unmaintained).

It would be nice to see a comparison of the various test frameworks and why one might select one over another. I use hspec currently (which also integrates with HUnit, QuickCheck, etc.), and couldn't tell at a glance what tasty might offer. And I particularly dislike writing tests inside of a gigantic list; I much prefer the "monadic" style of hspec.

This has been discussed on reddit here: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1jr8lb/tasty_a_new_testing_framewor...

Roman

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe