Re: [Haskell-cafe] Subcategories on Hackage

Why not hierarchical tags? (Tags organized in directories, well, basically, tags with slashes or dots) This is the most flexible IMHO. 2011/6/4 Vo Minh Thu

2011/6/4 Tillmann Vogt :

...

Hi,

There are some categories on Hackage that have become so large that it is hard to find something, i.e. Data(414 packages) and Graphics (191). Thats why I suggest to use subcategories separated from the category with a dot. To show that this makes sense I made subcategories for graphics libraries at the end of this email. Whatever happens to hackage2 this would be an immediate improvement.

How ------ I would volunteer for the manual categorization and let the community look over it. I could upload the changes with a script but the version number has to increase even if only the category has changed. I also don't want to be responsible for a massive spike in the upload statistics. Shouldn't the cabal file be excluded from the versioning policy? => It is allowed to upload a library with the same version number if only the cabal file has changed. One should write a notifiaction mail to all owners to reply if they don't agree. Then after a week executing the script that applies the changes.

[snip]

Hi,

I would simply prefer tags.

Actually, there is a problem that becomes even worse in your proposal: packages appearing in multiple categories, and packages not appearing in some expected category.

A simple example in your proposed categories: HDRUtils library: should it be in 2d, RasterFormats, or maybe in 2dFormats, ... with tags, 2d, raster, format, can be used, but also hdr, image, etc.

I don't remember what was proposed for hackage 2.

Cheers, Thu

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe