10 Mar
2009
10 Mar
'09
5:55 p.m.
bulat.ziganshin:
Hello Don,
Wednesday, March 11, 2009, 12:48:35 AM, you wrote:
unfortunately, Array library unboxed arrays still aren't based on any Unboxable *class*
Hmm. Aren't all the array library types based on MArray and IArray?
So I can define my own say, new STUArray element type by writing an instance of MArray for it. Like so:
yes, you can, just this definition duplicates too much code
Ah yes. Then in that case that is indeed true. Array / UArray aren't as extensible as the newer systems modelled on Storable (like UA in vector/uvector).