25 Sep
2007
25 Sep
'07
1:21 p.m.
Martin Lütke wrote:
Dominic Steinitz schrieb:
Look at the type of (.).(.) which should tell you how to compose functions with more than one variable. Mind you, I don't think it improves readability.
Dominic.
Interesting function. It got a sibling: (.)(.) :: (a1 -> b -> c) -> a1 -> (a -> b) -> a -> c
Anybody knows how to intepret that? I tried to call it with (++) "t" (++"s") "it" but suddenly got distracted.
All I know is that most of this stuff looks like ASCII art - and perhaps I need to see a doctor...