Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

Stephen Tetley writes:

On 3 July 2010 14:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:

...

So this argument isn't valid ;-)

I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.

Actually, how would you call it in Hugs? Just start it explicitly with the -98 flag? These modules currently don't load by default in ghci, since all the extensions are specified in the cabal file rather than in the source files with LANGUAGE pragmas. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com