Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haddock infix constructors in markup

I shouldn't have choosen Num for the constructor name, it led to confusions apparently. You can replace tha Num with anything you want, doesn't change the situation. I mean, it's not the problematic part. Is there any news about the fix in the lexer? When can we use it? On 27 April 2010 00:52, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:

On 27 April 2010 02:15, Ozgur Akgun wrote:

...

data Expr = Num Int | Expr :+: Expr | Expr :-: Expr

[snip]

-- | If the input is 'Num' does magic, if it is ':+:' does even more magic! someFunc :: Expr -> Expr

In the output of this markup, the 'Num' is hyperlinked but the ':+:' is not.

I would hazard a guess that the Num hyperlink points to the Num typeclass in the Prelude rather than your Num constructor. As for your infix constructor, I have no idea.

-- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com

-- Ozgur Akgun