2 Apr
2009
2 Apr
'09
11:05 a.m.
Jeff Heard wrote:
A last but somewhat minor thing is that the Event type is fairly general, allowing for multiple data to be attached to a single event and this data to be of many of the standard types (Int, String, Double, ByteString, etc) as well as a user-defined type. Of course, such an event type could be defined for other FRP frameworks as well.
That sounds the opposite of general. That sounds specific. (Int, String, Double, ByteString as well as a user-defined type....). Can you explain the reason for the EDouble, EString (etc.) alternatives as opposed to making the event simply (parametrically) polymorphic in "a" ? Jules