This is something I'd strongly vote against. It will likely create yet more
fights between people for control of any committee that designates which
packages are "recommended".
Let the community figure out which packages are best.
Let's instead encourage collaboration and agreement at package level, so we
work together towards having better packages, as opposed to many
not-so-good ones.
Ivan
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 08:29, Imants Cekusins
How about naming all official / recommended / _the_ packages with a prefix / suffix (e.g. base-*) and requiring an approval to create such packages?
This way, the required name would always be available when needed. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.