
As far a I know sets can implemented by implementing a list of anything(a
list of all types) The sets Haskell does have are AFAIK sets of elements of
the same type: these are not general sets.
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ketil Z. Malde"
"Scott J."
writes: I have a question. Why are sets not implemented in Haskell?
What do you mean? Isn't
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/hslibs/set.html
sufficient? (Remember to tell GHC '-package data')
-kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe