Re: [Haskell-cafe] Are there standard idioms for lazy, pure error handling?

Jason McCarty wrote:

wren ng thornton wrote:

...

concat1 :: T a b -> (b -> T a b) -> T a b

This could just as easily be

concat :: T a b -> (b -> T a c) -> T a c

right? It's a little weird to call this concatenation, but I bet it could come in handy.

Er right, that's what I meant. (Again the posting without enough coffee to pave over the cognitive potholes </chagrin>) -- Live well, ~wren