
29 May
2007
29 May
'07
10:29 a.m.
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:20:27AM +0100, David House wrote:
On 29/05/07, Daniel McAllansmith
wrote: Just in case there was some sort of miscommunication, the actual answer to your question is (/=) :: a -> a -> Bool, as Neil said.
Almost, (/=) :: Eq a => a -> a.
Almost again! (/=) :: Eq a => a -> a -> Bool Best regards Tomek