
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 11:18:18PM +0200, MigMit wrote:
On 08 Aug 2015, at 23:16, Tom Ellis
wrote: On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 11:14:40PM +0200, MigMit wrote:
On 08 Aug 2015, at 23:11, Tom Ellis
wrote: On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 11:02:27PM +0200, MigMit wrote:
What you say is "if we don't use some perfectly legitimate language constructs and never use third-party code, than 'data' and 'newtype' are the same".
No, not at all. I'm making a much stronger claim than that. I'm claiming the functionality provided by newtype is completely subsumed by that provided by data.
Well, it's certainly unsupported by evidence. Because third-party code CAN distinguish between those.
OK, show me the code!
I did. You removed it when quoting.
Reinstating:
Prelude> newtype A = A Int deriving Show Prelude> data B = B !Int deriving Show Prelude> let x = case x of A n -> A 1 in x A 1 Prelude> let y = case y of B n -> B 1 in y *** Exception: <<loop>>
This isn't third party code. It knows about the constructors of A and B.