Re: [Haskell-cafe] fromString and toString

Show is usually valid Haskell (at least derived instances are), and has instances for most types. This class would only be a conversion from types that *are* strings in some sense (like Text) to String. We have a (very small) package for this called 'isstring' that we use internally. It has instances for String, Text (x2) and ByteString (x2) assuming UTF8 encoding. I'd be happy to open source it if people are interested. Regards, Erik On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Atze van der Ploeg wrote:

Isn't toString just show?

On Feb 4, 2014 3:20 PM, "Johannes Waldmann" wrote:

...

Ben Foppa writes:

...

But do we have an inverse generic function toString defined anywhere?

well, we have: class Show a where show :: a -> String

...

likereString :: (IsString a, IsString b) => a -> b

well you probably don't want to actually convert from a to String (= List of Char) then from there to b, so it would need to be accompanied by some RULES (for specific instances of a, b) for efficiency.

This still does not answer the concern whether it is (semantically) wise to have String as the "base" concept here.

- J.W.

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe