Re: [Haskell-cafe] type checking failure curiosity

Perhaps you're right -- the monomorphism restriction wouldn't fire there, because there's no constraint to monomorphise. Instead, you just want a monomorphic `new`.... but I see no easy way (other than a type signature) to get this. Think of it this way: without the type annotation, you've said `let new = undefined in ...`. Now, replace `new` with `undefined` everywhere you've written `new`. Your code will include `null undefined`, which is indeed irresolvably ambiguous. Richard

On Nov 16, 2021, at 7:44 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:

...

My guess is that you've disabled the monomorphism restriction somehow... but you need the MR to type-check this code. Without the MR, `new` gets a type `forall a. a`, which gets specialized differently in `new`'s two occurrences, meaning that the type information from the second occurrence doesn't affect the first one... which you need it to in order to type-check the `null new` call.

Hm. I see the MR is off at the command prompt by default, but on in compiled modules. The offending code was in a module starting:

module CLTutorial9 where import Prelude hiding (lookup) import Data.Set(Set, insert, empty, member, fromList, toList, union,intersection, size, singleton, (\\)) import qualified Data.Set as S import Test.QuickCheck import Data.Char

I haven't knowingly done any thing to turn off the MR.