Re: [Haskell-cafe] Why is Bool no instance of Num and Bits?

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:36:41PM +0200, Stephan Friedrichs wrote:

When looking for an xor function, I found one in Data.Bits but couldn't use it for Bool, because Bool is no instance of Bits and of Num (which would be necessary, because it's "class (Num b) => Bits b"). My question is: Why not?

This has bothered me too. However, I think the root problem is that 'Num' is a superclass of 'Bits'. There is no reason it should be, all the default instances can be specified without the Num dependency. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/