Hi Ilya, Ilya Portnov wrote:
As far as can I see, using features of last GHC one could write typed TH library relatively easily, and saving backwards compatibility.
For example, now we have Q monad and Exp type in "template-haskell" package. Let's imagine some new package, say "typed-template-haskell", with new TQ monad and new polymorphic type Exp :: * -> *. Using last GHC's features, one will easily write something like "expr :: Exp String", which will mean that "expr" represents a string expression. And we will need a new function, say runTQ :: TQ a -> Q a (or some more complicated type), which will turn TypedTemplateHaskell's constructs into plain TH.
That would be a good thing to have. But it might be quite hard to implement. For example, I guess you might want to have functions like this one: apply :: Exp (a -> b) -> Exp a -> Exp b This function takes two typed expressions and produces an application. The types ensure that the generated application will typecheck. Cool. But can you do the same thing for lambdas? Lambdas create functions, so the type would be something like the following: lambda :: ... -> Exp (a -> b) But what would you put instead of the ...? I fear that overall, you would have to reimplement Haskell's type system in Haskell's type system. Which sounds like a cool thing to do, but maybe not so easily. Tillmann