
22 Feb
2011
22 Feb
'11
4:23 a.m.
Hi, C K Kashyap wrote:
I missed out the optimization bit .... yes, that would make a difference. However beyond that is it not just about graph reduction which should be the same?
Even if the number of reduction steps is the same, the bytecode interpreter is still slower than compiled code, because it takes more processor cycles per reduction step. This interpretative overhead could be avoided, for example, using just-in-time compilation à la Smalltalk or Java. Tillmann