17 May
2007
17 May
'07
9:06 p.m.
PR Stanley wrote:
Well, actually, this was scanned from a book but the OCR process wasn't 100% effective. So, I was hoping the list would easily identify and replace the erronious characters. Thanks for trying, anyway. Paul
...would it not be faster to pick up the book and check what the OCR got wrong? ;-) Anyway, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest
smaller = [a | a <- xs, a <= x] larger = [a | a <- xs, a > x]