Re: [Haskell-cafe] Encoding of Haskell source files

That's not what the official unicode site says in its FAQ: http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom4 and http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bomhttp://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom4 5 Cheers, -Tako On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 15:18, malcolm.wallace wrote:

BOM is not part of UTF8, because UTF8 is byte-oriented. But applications should be prepared to read and discard it, because some applications erroneously generate it.

Regards, Malcolm

On 04 Apr, 2011,at 02:09 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Max Bolingbroke wrote:

...

On 4 April 2011 11:34, Daniel Fischer wrote:

...

If there's only a single encoding recognised, UTF-8 surely should be the one (though perhaps Windows users might disagree, iirc, Windows uses UCS2 as standard encoding).

Windows APIs use UTF-16, but the encoding of files (which is the relevant point here) is almost uniformly UTF-8 - though of course you can find legacy apps making other choices.

Would we need to specifically allow for a Windows-style leading BOM in UTF-8 documents? I can never remember if it is truly a part of UTF-8 or not.

...

Cheers, Max

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe