
26 Aug
2011
26 Aug
'11
9:51 p.m.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:30:02 +0100, you wrote:
You wouldn't want to know how many bits you need to store on disk to reliably recreate the value?
I can't say that I have cared about that sort of thing in a very long time. Bits are rather cheap these days. I store data on disk, and the space it occupies is whatever it is; I don't worry about it.
Or how many bits of randomness you need to compute a value less than or equal to this one?
I'm not sure I understand this one. I generally don't need _any_ randomness to compute a value. On the other hand, if the desire is to take an integer n and generate a set of pseudorandom numbers ranging from 0 to n-1, that's easily done using the standard random number methods. -Steve Schafer