
27 Apr
2014
27 Apr
'14
10:25 p.m.
Hey Conrad! That sounds like a nice idea. I might have a look at it after I have actually figured out what the fastest/best way is (see the benchmarks I just posted). Niklas On 28/04/14 01:00, Conrad Parker wrote:
Niklas,
just for fun, and seeing as your goal is to make something that works elegeantly and efficiently with list syntax, how about making a new type that's an instance of OverloadedLists but never actually allocates anything, so you can basically desugar "X.forM_ [a..b]" to your loop function?
Conrad.