
7 Sep
2010
7 Sep
'10
3:10 p.m.
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 20:36 +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Why not to define it for any monad, for example STM (TVars) and whatever?
I'm really sorry but I fail to see what does 'it' refers to. reference 0.1 contains at this moment definitions for: - Reference TVar STM - Reference IORef IO - Reference MVar IO - Reference (STRef s) (ST s) (http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/reference/0.1/doc/html/Data-Refe...) So in fact there is already support for STM/TVar pair. Regards