20 Feb
2009
20 Feb
'09
5:17 p.m.
Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Don,
Saturday, February 21, 2009, 12:43:46 AM, you wrote:
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops 0.318 ghc "-funroll-loops" -D64 0.088
So what did we learn here?
nothing new: what you are not interested in real compilers comparison, preferring to demonstrate artificial results
...that we have a path to get better results than gcc -O3 -funroll-loops, and it's within reach... we even can get there now, albeit not in the most hack-free way imaginable? -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.