11 Jul
2007
11 Jul
'07
5:21 p.m.
Yes, that's one way to define IO. But it's not the only way.
On 7/11/07, Jonathan Cast
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
Well, Haskell defines the IO type to be abstract, so if IO and ST happen to be the same it's implementation dependent.
And if IO uses a RealWorld type, that's implementation dependent too. But it's still useful to understand both RealWorld as used by IO and the same mechanism as used by ST.
Jonathan Cast http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-core http://sourceforge.net/projects/fid-emacs _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe