13 Oct
2009
13 Oct
'09
8:26 a.m.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Ariel J. Birnbaum
What about Lambdabot?
The official (?) personification of Lambdabot is OK, but lacks moe[1], which the OP seems to intend by using the suffix '-tan'. In any case, she represents Lambdabot only, not Haskell in general.
A lambdabot-specific personification is fine too, but I agree that it lacks charm. Though I wonder, where should we put these? Having the lambdabot one on the lambdabot page is fine, but haskell-tan would have to be stuck on the front page. Which seems a bit too much. -- Svein Ove Aas