
I've been wrestling with this for a while and I decided eventually to look for help. I've been hoping to design a domain specific embedded language in Haskell that would let me pipe a commutative monad throughout an expression written in the language. Special terms within the language will eventually have access to this monad. I've created a simplified version here to represent the main issues. Here is what I'd like from the language: * To use haskell syntax for substitution and pattern matching rather than implementing this myself. * To be able to express lambdas in my language. * To be able to embed any haskell terms including functions into the language. * I'd like the Haskell type checker to tell me about bad terms. * I'd like to thread a monad through the entire expression. So here is the first implementation that I tried of this (full source here: http://lpaste.net/142959) data Exp m x where Val :: m x -> Exp m x Lam1 :: m (a -> Exp m b) -> Exp m (a -> b) Lam2 :: m (a -> Exp m (b -> c)) -> Exp m (a -> b -> c) a function liftE allows me to lift a haskell term into an expression: liftE x = Val $ return x Application is a function <@> so: (<@>) :: forall m a b. Monad m => Exp m (a -> b) -> Exp m a -> Exp m b (<@>) (Val f) (Val x) = Val $ f `ap` x (<@>) (Lam2 f) (Val x) = Lam1 $ f >>= \f' -> x >>= \x' -> unLam1 $ f' x' (<@>) (Lam1 f) (Val x) = Val $ f >>= \f' -> x >>= \x' -> unVal $ f' x' Seems like it might work! In fact it does typecheck. So the first test expressions I'd like to try are these: mapE :: Monad m => Exp m ((a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]) mapE = Lam2 $ return $ \ f -> Lam1 $ return $ \ xxs -> case xxs of [] -> liftE [] (x:xs) -> liftE (:) <@> liftE (f x) <@> (mapE <@> liftE f <@> liftE xs) testExpression :: Monad m => Exp m [Int] testExpression = mapE <@> liftE (+10) <@> liftE [1,2,3,4] and just to justify doing any of this I'll create a Monad called BindCounter that counts the number of times bind is called: newtype BindCounter a = BC (Int -> (Int, a)) runBC (BC f) = f 0 instance Functor (BindCounter) where fmap f (BC x) = BC $ \t -> let (t', x') = x t in (t', f x') instance Applicative (BindCounter) where pure x = BC (\t -> (t,x)) f <*> x = f >>= \f' -> x >>= \x' -> return $ f' x' instance Monad (BindCounter) where return = pure BC f >>= g = BC $ \old -> let (new, val) = f (old + 1) BC f' = g val in f' new now I can try a test test = let (count, result) = runBC (unVal testExpression) in putStrLn $ "Count: " ++ show count ++ " Result: " ++ show result The result in ghci is: Count: 36 Result: [11,12,13,14] Ok so that's a lot. I was surprised I got this working. You can see from the code that my main gripe with this is I haven't found a way to remove the need to specify the number of embedded lambdas using Lam1 and Lam2 (we could easily add more) and I haven't found a way to apply a Lam to another Lam. I'm also curious if I am reinventing the wheel, I hadn't found a library yet that let's me do something similar.