Re: [Haskell-cafe] MState: A consistent State monad for concurrent applications

2 Jul 2010

      On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote:
...
In other words, don't be shy!
Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock:

     evalMState :: Forkable m
                => MState t m a      -- ^ Action to evaluate
                -> t                 -- ^ Initial state value
                -> m a

This (and run-/execMState) gets rendered incorrectly. "Action to 
evaluate" is completly lost and "Initial state value" has moved one 
upwards to the "MState t m a". Is that a haddock bug or my fault?

Re: [Haskell-cafe] MState: A consistent State monad for concurrent applications

Nils Schweinsberg