Yesterday I read a rather interesting paper: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mb566/papers/tacc-hs09.pdf It's fascinating stuff, and I *think* I understand the gist of what it's saying. However, the paper is utterly festooned with formulas that look so absurdly over-the-top that they might almost be a spoof of a mathematical formula rather than the real thing. A tiny fraction of the notation is explained in the paper, but the rest is simply "taken to be obvious". The paper also uses several ordinary English words in a way that suggests that they are supposed to have a more specific technical meaning - but I have no idea what. Does anybody have any idea which particular dialect of pure math this paper is speaking? (And where I can go read about it...)