15 Jan
2009
15 Jan
'09
5:04 p.m.
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:59 +0000, Thomas DuBuisson wrote:
How does forcing them to learn proposed terminology such as `Appendable' help here? Learners of Haskell do still need to learn what the new word means.
The contention is that 'Appendable' is an intuitive naming that people will already have a rudimentary grasp of.
But this contention is false. jcc