10 May
2019
10 May
'19
3:45 a.m.
Am Fr., 10. Mai 2019 um 00:05 Uhr schrieb Brandon Allbery < allbery.b@gmail.com>:
[...] In short, if you are still talking about Haskell, default-strict isn't an option. A strict Haskell-*like* language is an option, but it won't be Haskell; its idioms will be different and library compatibility will be dubious at best.
+1. I think one (quite old) point has been missed so far in this discussion: "Strict evaluation is fundamentally flawed for function reuse.", see http://augustss.blogspot.com/2011/05/.