Re: [Haskell-cafe] Canonical Graphviz code

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:

Felipe Lessa writes:

...

I'm sorry for being silly, but what's the motivation of having this canonic form? =)

A few things come to mind:

* Easier to reason about, [...] * Less ambiguity: [...]

So you want to do some post-processing to the Dot graph inside Haskell-land? Or is it just a pretty printer? I mean, Dot will accept both and produce the same result (by definition), so if you just wanted to draw it then there wouldn't be any difference. Cheers! :) -- Felipe.