
16 May
2014
16 May
'14
2:56 a.m.
On 14-05-15 03:06 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, silvio
mailto:silvio.frischi@gmail.com> wrote: you can specify the associativity using infix(l/r) expression
Which will break almost all existing code in order to enable something that is dubious at best given how much . is already overloaded. And gains you nothing in the way of "object oriented" as cited in your subject line --- . is the *least* of the issues involved with OO, and is used in the way you want by non-OO languages.
What Wadler said. Talking too much syntax, too little semantics.