Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the consensus about -fwarn-unused-do-bind ?

On 10 April 2010 00:20, Neil Brown wrote:

The comments in that bug report actually mention "My patch does not warn on uses of >>, only in do-notation, where the situation is more clear cut".  I take >> to be an explicit sign that the user wants to ignore the result of the first action, whereas in do-notation it may be an accident.  So I think it was the right decision.

Ahhh, I missed that bit. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com