Re: [Haskell-cafe] Alternatives to convoluted record syntax

For access to nested record fields I implemented the record-access package. Unfortunately the field accessors must still be written manually. http://darcs.haskell.org/record-access/src/Data/Accessor/Example.hs

I looked for this on hackage, but found instead this: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/data-accessor which, unless I am mistaken, is actually a different package by Luke Palmer, with similar intent. Should we be trying to avoid name overlaps like this? Tim