7 Jun
2015
7 Jun
'15
11:36 p.m.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:23 PM, aditya siram
How would people feel about Haddock alphabetizing record accessors by default?
It occurs to me that the Haskell Report specifies that Read instances for record types accept the fields only in declaration order[1], and it might therefore be preferable to maintain that order in API documentation. [1] https://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/haskellch11.html#x18-186000... see point 3 under "Derived instances of Read' -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net