Yes. Use the ST ("State Thread") monad. Data.Array.ST, STRef etc.
2009/4/22 Daniel K.
Hello,
imagine the following situation: You want to implement e.g. Dijkstra's algorithm to find a shortest path between nodes u and v in a graph. This algorithm relies heavily on mutating arrays, so the type signature would look something like
getDistance :: Graph -> Node -> Node -> IO Int
Not mutating the underlying arrays would probably result in poor performance. BUT: For a constant graph, the distance between two nodes stays the same all the time, so in fact getDistance should be a pure function! So here is my question: Is there a way to write functions in Haskell that do some IO internally, but that are guaranteed to be side-effect free? Of course one would have to make sure that the array that is mutated inside getDistance must not be accessible from outside the function.
Is that possible? If not, wouldn't that be desirable? If not, why not?
Thanks
Daniel
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Eugene Kirpichov Web IR developer, market.yandex.ru