27 Aug
2008
27 Aug
'08
5:17 p.m.
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 02:35 -0700, John Meacham wrote: [cut]
However, note the weasel words. Those are in there on purpose, every design calls for different solutions. To blanketly say certain constructs are just wrong to the point of disallowing them in the language, especially when they are common practice at the moment, just doesn't seem right.
How can a Haskell user say this? And this is indeed exactly what capability languages do. In fact, this is what almost every language does (for one thing in common practice or another.)