*sigh* sorry, disregard part of this, I missed something obvious. I just
need to replace `MaxSIsSMaxEQ o` with `Sym (MaxSIsSMaxEQ o)`, and then it
works.
However, I'm still somewhat confused - the reason why I thought the type
family application was the problem to begin with is that I tried this:
type Foo :: Max n (S m) :~: S (Max n m) -> ()
type family Foo p where
Foo Refl = '()
and it results in the error
• Couldn't match kind: Max n ('S m)
with: 'S (Max n m)
Expected kind ‘Max n ('S m) :~: 'S (Max n m)’,
but ‘Refl’ has kind ‘Max n ('S m) :~: Max n ('S m)’
• In the first argument of ‘Foo’, namely ‘Refl’
In the type family declaration for ‘Foo’
What is the reason I can't pattern match on Refl here? I would expect it to
simply being the constraint `Max n (S m) ~ S (Max n m)` into scope.
Thanks,
Jakob
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:52 AM Jakob Brünker
Imagine you want to have a type level function that calculates the element-wise OR on two bitstrings, encoded as length-indexed vectors filled with Bools (this is a simplification of something I need for a project). The vectors should be "aligned to the right" as it were, such that the new right-most value is True if the right-most value of the first vector OR the right-most value of the second vector was True.
Example (replacing True and False with 1 and 0 for readability): ElementwiseOr [1,0,1,1] [0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1] = [0,1,1,0,1,0,1,1]
Its type would be something like ElementwiseOr :: Vec n Bool -> Vec m Bool -> Vec (Max n m) Bool
I have written the following code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies, GADTs, DataKinds, StandaloneKindSignatures, PolyKinds, TypeOperators, RankNTypes, TypeApplications, UndecidableInstances #-}
import Data.Kind import Data.Type.Equality
data Nat = Z | S Nat
infixr 5 :<
type Vec :: Nat -> Type -> Type data Vec n a where Nil :: Vec Z a (:<) :: a -> Vec n a -> Vec (S n) a
type Cong :: forall f -> a :~: b -> f a :~: f b type family Cong f p where Cong f Refl = Refl
type Max :: Nat -> Nat -> Nat type family Max n m where Max Z m = m Max n Z = n Max (S n) (S m) = S (Max n m)
-- The reason for this slightly convoluted Ordering type is that it seems -- to make the "right-alignment" easier. type NatOrdering :: Ordering -> Nat -> Nat -> Type data NatOrdering o n m where NOLTE :: NatOrdering EQ n m -> NatOrdering LT n (S m) NOLTS :: NatOrdering LT n m -> NatOrdering LT n (S m) NOEQZ :: NatOrdering EQ Z Z NOEQS :: NatOrdering EQ n m -> NatOrdering EQ (S n) (S m) NOGTE :: NatOrdering EQ n m -> NatOrdering GT (S n) m NOGTS :: NatOrdering GT n m -> NatOrdering GT (S n) m
type MaxSIsSMaxEQ :: forall n m . NatOrdering EQ n m -> Max n (S m) :~: S (Max n m) type family MaxSIsSMaxEQ o where MaxSIsSMaxEQ NOEQZ = Refl MaxSIsSMaxEQ (NOEQS o) = Cong S (MaxSIsSMaxEQ o)
type TransportVec :: n :~: m -> Vec n a -> Vec m a type family TransportVec p v where TransportVec Refl v = v
type ElementwiseOr :: NatOrdering o n m -> Vec n Bool -> Vec m Bool -> Vec (Max n m) Bool type family ElementwiseOr o u v where ElementwiseOr (NOLTE o) u (s :< v) = TransportVec (MaxSIsSMaxEQ o) (s :< ElementwiseOr o u v) -- XXX -- other equations ommitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To me, the equation at the end marked with XXX seems like it should work. However, it produces the following error:
• Couldn't match kind: Max n ('S m) with: 'S (Max n m) Expected kind ‘'S (Max n m) :~: 'S (Max n m)’, but ‘MaxSIsSMaxEQ o’ has kind ‘Max n ('S m) :~: 'S (Max n m)’ • In the first argument of ‘TransportVec’, namely ‘(MaxSIsSMaxEQ o)’
So it expects something of kind `S (Max n m) :~: S (Max n m)` - it seems like Refl fits that bill, but that doesn't work either, because replacing (MaxSIsSMaxEQ o) with Refl means that TransportVec returns a type of the wrong kind, producing a very similar error.
I suspect the reason this doesn't work is because type equality isn't equipped to properly handle type family applications. I could potentially work around this if I defined Max as
data Max n m r where MaxZZ :: Max Z Z Z MaxSZ :: Max (S n) Z (S n) MaxZS :: Max Z (S m) (S m) MaxSS :: Max n m r -> Max (S n) (S m) (S r)
However, dealing with a proof object like this is a lot less convenient than just being able to use a type family for most purposes, so I'd like to avoid this if possible.
Is there a way to make this work while sticking with type families?
Thanks
Jakob