BuildWrapper has some code that tries to link back the comments to the
declaration from the AST generated by haskell-src-exts and the comments.
See
https://github.com/JPMoresmau/BuildWrapper/blob/master/src/Language/Haskell/....
The unit tests provide some samples:
https://github.com/JPMoresmau/BuildWrapper/blob/master/test/Language/Haskell....
Maybe this can help you.
JP
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: On 20/08/13 09:48, Niklas Hambüchen wrote: Nice! I hope that haskell-suite will eventually become awesome and solve most
of our automation-on-Haskell-code needs. Two questions: 1) My most desired feature would be a syntax tree that does not pluck
pluck comments out and make me treat them separately. It looks much
easier to me to have a fully descriptive tree and (filter . concatMap) /
traverse them out in some way than getting a list of comments and having
to insert them back in the right places myself.
Is that possible? +1 for this. There was a small discussion relevant to this on café
recently, if anyone is interested:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/106768 2) Have you considered downloading the all-of-Hackage tarball and
running haskell-src-exts over it to get a benchmark of how much HSE can
already parse of the Haskell code out there? Thanks! --
Mateusz K. _______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe --
JP Moresmau
http://jpmoresmau.blogspot.com/