4 Jan
2006
4 Jan
'06
5:42 a.m.
Sure. Type classes, as Ketil Malde has suggested. On Jan 4, 2006, at 2:09 AM, Dylan Thurston wrote:
Looking at this code, I wonder if there are better ways to express what you really want using static typing. To wit, with records, you give an example
data Pot = Pot { pProfit :: !Word64, pAmounts :: ![Word64] -- Word16/ } deriving (Show, Typeable)