22 Nov
2010
22 Nov
'10
5:15 p.m.
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 08:24 +0000, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
If the mailing list replaced Reply-To header it would required additional effort for responders instead of just pressing reply-to- all.
If the list were to add a "Reply-To:" header, but only in the case where one was not already present, that would seem to me to be ideal. (None of the internet polemics against Reply-To that I have seen, have considered this modest suggestion.)
Except... I don't use Reply-To because it defaults to sender so it will still be breaking the RFC - in most cases (as most people don't set the Reply-To header). Regards