Since this thread is ostensibly about haskell style, it should also be
about haskell style *today*.
As I think Yitz noted earlier, this is a moving target.
Adoption of haskell by the masses -- moving.
Skill of haskell hordes -- moving.
Abstractions available as part of "idiomatic haskell", and correctness
of these abstractions, as the state monad for partitions cockup shows
-- also moving.
2009/3/25 Jonathan Cast
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 12:48 -0700, Dan Weston wrote:
However, there is something to be said for code that just looks like a > duck and quacks like a duck. It's less likely to surprise you. > > So... I insist... Easy for a beginner to read == better!
All you have said is that one building a skyscraper will need scaffolding, blueprints, and a good building inspector. The intended inhabitants of that skyscraper will not want to stare out at scaffolding for the rest of their lives.
+1
jcc