7 Aug
2008
7 Aug
'08
3:18 a.m.
Henning, Cool ... thx, vasili On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Henning Thielemann < lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
1) Is there a common assumed semantics across all of the Haskell
things? withString? withData?
2) If the answer to 1) is yes, then does this imply some kind of polymorphism? Couldn't "with" be "reduced" to a higher order function
"with" then
??
The Continuation monad abstracts the idea of 'with': http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-February/038963.html