I know what you're saying, in a way. There is much haskell code that's completely illegible to me. I would say there is a difference between Haskell and Perl though, in that Perl code is "too smart" aka. "clever", while Haskell code is usually simply, well, too smart. This means code written using aspects of covariant generalized applicative combinators in a closed Hillbert-space like continuous field ring, and other similar nonsense. There was a time when "monadic parser combinator" sounded equally nonsensical to me. It doesn't anymore, and I'm a better programmer for it, being able to reduce one of my earliest Haskell programs from 200 to 20 lines using that knowledge alone while making it more comprehensible and maintainable at the same time. The difference between Haskell and Perl is that Haskell programmers use clever ideas while Perl programmers use clever abuse of syntax. Ideas, at least, you have a hope of understanding sometime in the future. ty. den 24.03.2009 klokka 18:41 (+0100) skreiv Manlio Perillo:
Hi.
In these days I'm discussing with some friends, that mainly use Python as programming language, but know well other languages like Scheme, Prolog, C, and so.
These friends are very interested in Haskell, but it seems that the main reason why they don't start to seriously learning it, is that when they start reading some code, they feel the "Perl syndrome".
That is, code written to be "too smart", and that end up being totally illegible by Haskell novice.
I too have this feeling, from time to time.
Since someone is starting to write the Haskell coding style, I really suggest him to take this "problem" into strong consideration.
Manlio _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe