
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya < jyotirmoy@jyotirmoy.net> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Jeremy
wrote: Compared to the Nim code [https://github.com/logicchains/LPATHBench/blob/master/nim.nim] for a longest path algorithm, Haskell [https://github.com/logicchains/LPATHBench/blob/master/hs.hs] looks horrendously verbose and ugly, even if you ignore the pragmas and imports.
Is this idiomatic Haskell style? Could it be clearer, but has to be written that way for performance - although it still takes 3.7x as long as the Nim version [https://github.com/logicchains/LPATHBench/blob/master/writeup.md ]?
A clearer version http://lpaste.net/120981 though this is 2x-3x slower than the Haskell version above.
Another version that uses mutable vectors to track the visited nodes and has almost the same run time as the Haskell version in the LPATHBench repository:
http://lpaste.net/121012 Regards, Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya