dan.doel:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 8:54:15 pm Dan Doel wrote:
On Thursday 11 February 2010 12:43:10 pm stefan kersten wrote:
On 10.02.10 19:03, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector.
that would be even better of course! an O(0) solution, at least for me ;) let me know if i can be of any help (e.g. in testing). i suppose uvector-algorithms would also need to be ported to vector, then.
I could do this.
To this end, I've done a preliminary port of the library, such that all the modules compile. I've just used safe operations so far, so it's probably a significant decrease in performance over the 0.2 uvector-algorithms (unless perhaps you turn off the bounds checking flag), but it's a start. It can be gotten with:
I've ported uvector's tests to vector, and mostly got identical code, except for: * tail * zip* * empty/null I think if you find any slowdown over uvector it has to be a bug in vector. Let Roman know. -- Don