24 May
2007
24 May
'07
10:50 a.m.
On 5/24/07, Adrian Hey
Taral wrote:
The other syntaxes proposed don't strike me as sufficiently rigorous.
Me neither. It's always been a great source of puzzlement to me why this very simple and IMO conservative proposal should be so controversial. Unless someone can point out some severe semantic difficulty or suggest something better it seems like a no-brainer to me.
I think it lacks implementation. I don't have time, or I'd look into
hacking this into GHC.
--
Taral