6 Apr
2009
6 Apr
'09
5:53 p.m.
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Kalman Noel wrote:
I'm not complaining, and I'm not sure what I mean :) I may like a scheme where functions operating on a type or type class live in a module seperate from the type (class) definition, so you could import a specific module to get only, say, (Ring, (*), one, ...). But that would be too tedious in the Haskell hierarchical module system, which is why I was asking about others.
It was precisely my goal to bundle the type with the functions that operate on it. Why do you want to separate them?